Alexey Lapitsky lex.pub...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay. It prints exactly the same:
[3.792033] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues)
[3.802191] vda: vda1 vda2 vda5
A little bit more about my setup (if it helps):
OK, I think this is fixed by
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay. It prints exactly the same:
[3.792033] virtqueue elements = 128, max_segments = 126 (1 queues)
[3.802191] vda: vda1 vda2 vda5
A little bit more about my setup (if it helps):
It's a qemu-system-x86_64 kvm instance with 16 cores and 10G of RAM.
I can
Alexey Lapitsky lex.pub...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs.
Here's an example of the backtrace:
https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932
I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem:
- BUG_ON(total_sg
Hi,
I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs.
Here's an example of the backtrace:
https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932
I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem:
- BUG_ON(total_sg vq-vring.num);
+ BUG_ON(total_sg vq-vring.num
correct.
If I have an indirect ring and I'm adding sgs to it and the host is
delayed (say I've got a thread consuming things from the vring and its
off doing something interesting),
I'd really like to get ENOSPC back from virtqueue_add. However if the
indirect addition fails due to free_sg
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Rusty,
current virtio-ring.c has a BUG_ON in virtqueue_add that checks
total_sg vg-vring.num, however I'm not sure it really is 100%
correct.
If I have an indirect ring and I'm adding sgs to it and the host is
delayed (say I've got a thread
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
correct.
If I have an indirect ring and I'm adding sgs to it and the host is
delayed (say I've got a thread consuming things from the vring and its
off doing something interesting),
I'd really like to get ENOSPC back from virtqueue_add. However if the
