On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:44:14PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:27:53 -0500
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > A virtio transport is free to implement some of the callbacks in
> > > virtio_config_ops in
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:27:53 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > A virtio transport is free to implement some of the callbacks in
> > virtio_config_ops in a matter that they cannot be called from
> > atomic context (e.g. virtio-cc
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:27:53 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > A virtio transport is free to implement some of the callbacks in
> > virtio_config_ops in a matter that they cannot be called from
> > atomic context (e.g. virtio-cc
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> A virtio transport is free to implement some of the callbacks in
> virtio_config_ops in a matter that they cannot be called from
> atomic context (e.g. virtio-ccw, which maps a lot of the callbacks
> to channel I/O, which is an inhere
