On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000
> Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
> > > the patches ou
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will
> it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else?
No longer needed.
For the short term lguest has a separate entry point. For the long term
2.6.23 we will rev the boot protocol
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000
Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
> > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
> > abou
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
> the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
> about the author's personal appearance, etc.
Thanks Andrew,
This means I can fi
Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
about the author's personal appearance, etc.
I'll plan on sending these patches off to Linus in a week's time, assuming
all goes well.
Thanks.
_
