On (Sun) 02 Oct 2011 [11:33:26], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:19:40PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Remove all the vqs on hibernation and re-create them after restoring
from a hibernated image. This keeps networking working across
hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Amit
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Sun) 02 Oct 2011 [11:33:26], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:19:40PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Remove all the vqs on hibernation and re-create them after restoring
from a hibernated image. This keeps
On (Tue) 04 Oct 2011 [10:36:05], Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:49:21 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:55:56PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Hello,
These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. The
patches are
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:43:12AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch series contains two fixes for the RFC patch send by Michael. These
patches are pretty basic and should probably be merged into the next version
of that patch.
Yes, will do, thanks!
Other two patches add support to the
Guest features selector spelling mistake.
Cc: Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com
Cc: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
---
Hopefully not too late to fix, should possibly be done in one of the next RCs
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:33:46PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 15 Nov 2011 [14:51:27], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Sun) 02 Oct 2011 [11:33:26], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:19:40PM +0530, Amit Shah
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 15 Nov 2011 [16:23:00], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:33:46PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 15 Nov 2011 [14:51:27], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:59:36PM +0530, Amit Shah
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:17 +, Sasha Levin wrote:
Guest features selector spelling mistake.
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h b/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h
index 27c7ede..5c7b6f0 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 10:14 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote on 11/14/2011 03:45:40 PM:
Why both the bandwidth and latency performance are dropping so
dramatically with multiple VQ?
It looks like theres no hash sync between host and guest, which
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:14:27 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:54:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Indeed, I'd like to see two changes to your proposal:
(1) It should be all or nothing. If a driver can find the virtio header
capability, it
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:39:13 +0200, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
(2) There's no huge win in keeping the same layout. Let's make some
cleanups. There are more users ahead of us then behind us (I
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:25:22 +, Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:17 +, Sasha Levin wrote:
Guest features selector spelling mistake.
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h b/include/linux/virtio_mmio.h
index 27c7ede..5c7b6f0 100644
---
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:53:05 +, Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com wrote:
+static char *virtio_mmio_cmdline_devices;
+module_param_named(devices, virtio_mmio_cmdline_devices, charp, 0);
This is the wrong way to do this.
Don't put things in a charp and process it later. It's lazy. You
should
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:56:06 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:03:13PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:12:53PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
A virtio driver does virtqueue_add_buf() multiple times before finally
calling
On 11/15/2011 12:44 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote on 11/14/2011 03:45:40 PM:
Why both the bandwidth and latency performance are dropping so
dramatically with multiple VQ?
It looks like theres no hash sync between host and guest, which makes
the RX VQ
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:05AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:14:27 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:54:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Indeed, I'd like to see two changes to your proposal:
(1) It should be all or
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:26AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:56:06 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:03:13PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:12:53PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
A virtio
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:52AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:39:13 +0200, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
wrote:
(2) There's no huge win in keeping the same layout. Let's make some
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34:42AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:05:07 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:25:17PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com wrote:
Why both the
19 matches
Mail list logo
