> -Original Message-
> From: Denis V. Lunev [mailto:d...@openvz.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 6:46 AM
> To: Eric Blake
> Cc: Gleb Natapov ; qemu-de...@nongnu.org;
> virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org; rka...@virtuozzo.com; Paolo
> Bonzini ; Andrey Smetanin
> ; Vitaly Kuzne
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:42:42AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 07:39 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > From: Andrey Smetanin
> >
> > A new vcpu exit is introduced to notify the userspace of the
> > changes in Hyper-V synic configuraion triggered by guest writing to the
> Again, is 'synic
On 12/10/2015 15:42, Eric Blake wrote:
> > +related with Hyper-V emulation. Currently used to synchronize modified
> > +Hyper-V synic state with userspace.
>
> Again, is 'synic' intended? Hmm, I see it throughout the patch, so it
> looks intentional, but I keep trying to read it as a typo for 's
On 10/12/2015 04:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/09/2015 07:39 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
From: Andrey Smetanin
A new vcpu exit is introduced to notify the userspace of the
changes in Hyper-V synic configuraion triggered by guest writing to the
s/configuraion/configuration/
Is 'synic' intended?
On 10/12/2015 07:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 07:39 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> From: Andrey Smetanin
>>
>> A new vcpu exit is introduced to notify the userspace of the
>> changes in Hyper-V synic configuraion triggered by guest writing to the
>
> s/configuraion/configuration/
> Is '
On 10/09/2015 07:39 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> From: Andrey Smetanin
>
> A new vcpu exit is introduced to notify the userspace of the
> changes in Hyper-V synic configuraion triggered by guest writing to the
s/configuraion/configuration/
Is 'synic' intended? Is it short for something (if so, s
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58:36AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 10:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Going back to Paolo's original question, I think changing the check
> > to !KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP makes sense, if I understand the code
> > correctly. They seem to be the only special on
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:42:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> You need to add SYNIC vectors to the EOI exit bitmap, so that APICv
> (Xeon E5 or higher, Ivy Bridge or newer) is handled correctly. You also
> need to check the auto EOI exit bitmap in __apic_accept_irq, and avoid
> going through kv
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 15:39, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > A new vcpu exit is introduced to notify the userspace of the
> > changes in Hyper-V synic configuraion triggered by guest writing to the
> > corresponding MSRs.
>
> Why is this exit nece
On 12/10/2015 10:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Going back to Paolo's original question, I think changing the check
> to !KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP makes sense, if I understand the code
> correctly. They seem to be the only special one.
Great. Roman, Denis, can you do this then?
Thanks,
Paolo
_
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:54:41 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 09.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > Christian, the question for you is towards the end...
>
>
>
> []
> >
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
> >> @@ -144,11 +144,13 @@ static int setup_
Am 09.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Christian, the question for you is towards the end...
[]
>
>> --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
>> @@ -144,11 +144,13 @@ static int setup_routing_entry(struct
>> kvm_irq_routing_table *rt,
>>
>> /*
>> * Do not
12 matches
Mail list logo
