Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC 0/3] virtio-iommu: a paravirtualized IOMMU

2017-04-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 07:39:24PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On 07/04/17 22:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:17:44PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > >> There are a number of advantages in a paravirtualized IOMMU over a full > >> emulation. It is

Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC 0/3] virtio-iommu: a paravirtualized IOMMU

2017-04-10 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
On 07/04/17 22:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:17:44PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> There are a number of advantages in a paravirtualized IOMMU over a full >> emulation. It is portable and could be reused on different architectures. >> It is easier to implement

[PULL] vhost: cleanups and fixes

2017-04-10 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
These changes were as in linux-next as e1c287efcd4cf688564ed1112d032b5dac29b159 - I tweaked the commit log slightly. Too many people were complaining of warnings and errors in virtio so I decided revert is the safest path forward right now. The following changes since commit