Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: move force_dma_unencrypted() to mem_encrypt.h

2020-02-24 Thread Halil Pasic
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:33:14 +1100 David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 07:07:02PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:48:15 -0500 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:06:39PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Willem de Bruijn
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: > > From: Anton Ivanov > > Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which > arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no > fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter > than the MTU (752 in my experiments). Do we

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 24/02/2020 20:20, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: From: Anton Ivanov Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which arrive at

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: let virtio use DMA API when guest RAM is protected

2020-02-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:33:40PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > AFAIU you have a positive attitude towards the idea, that > > !F_VIRTIO_PLATFORM implies 'no DMA API is used by virtio' > > should be scrapped. > > > > I would

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: From: Anton Ivanov Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter than the MTU

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Willem de Bruijn
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: > > On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: > >> > >> From: Anton Ivanov > >> > >> Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which > >> arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no

Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: let virtio use DMA API when guest RAM is protected

2020-02-24 Thread Halil Pasic
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:36:45 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > By "legacy devices" I assume you mean pre-virtio-1.0 devices, that > > lack the F_VERSION_1 feature flag. Is that right? Because I don't > > see how being a legacy device or not relates to use of the DMA API. > > No. "legacy"

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio: decouple protected guest RAM form VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM

2020-02-24 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/2/24 下午9:56, Halil Pasic wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:26:20 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: That's better. How about attached? Thanks Thanks Jason! It does avoid the translation overhead in vhost. Tested-by: Halil Pasic Regarding the code, you fence it in virtio-net.c, but AFAIU this

[PATCH] virtio_ring: Fix mem leak with vring_new_virtqueue()

2020-02-24 Thread Suman Anna via Virtualization
The functions vring_new_virtqueue() and __vring_new_virtqueue() are used with split rings, and any allocations within these functions are managed outside of the .we_own_ring flag. The commit cbeedb72b97a ("virtio_ring: allocate desc state for split ring separately") allocates the desc state within

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Willem de Bruijn
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: > > On 24/02/2020 20:20, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov > > wrote: > >> On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: > From: Anton Ivanov > >

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 25/02/2020 04:02, Jason Wang wrote: On 2020/2/25 上午6:22, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 20:20, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/virtio: Support virtgpu exported resources

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > +struct dma_buf *virtgpu_gem_prime_export(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > + int flags) > +{ [ ... ] > +} > + > +struct drm_gem_object *virtgpu_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev, > + struct dma_buf *buf) >

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 24/02/2020 22:22, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 20:20, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: From:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: add dma-buf support for exported objects

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:06:36PM +0900, David Stevens wrote: > This change adds a new flavor of dma-bufs that can be used by virtio > drivers to share exported objects. A virtio dma-buf can be queried by > virtio drivers to obtain the UUID which identifies the underlying > exported object. That

Re: [PATCH 10/52] drm/cirrus: Use drmm_add_final_kfree

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:40AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > With this we can drop the final kfree from the release function. > > I also noticed that cirrus forgot to call drm_dev_fini(). > > v2: Don't call kfree(cirrus) after we've handed overship of that to > drm_device and the drmm_

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio: decouple protected guest RAM form VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM

2020-02-24 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/2/24 下午3:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:45:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: On 2020/2/24 下午2:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:01:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: On 2020/2/21 下午10:56, Halil Pasic wrote: On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:22:26 +0800

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/qxl: Use simple encoder

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:48:15AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The qxl driver uses an empty implementation for its encoder. Replace > the code with the generic simple encoder. > > v2: > * rebase onto new simple-encoder interface > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Acked-by: Gerd

Re: [PATCH 31/52] drm/cirrus: Fully embrace devm_

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:21:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > With the drm_device lifetime fun cleaned up there's nothing in the way > anymore to use devm_ for everything hw releated. Do it, and in the > process, throw out the entire onion unwinding. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc:

Re: [PATCH 30/52] drm/cirrus: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:21:00AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We can even delete the drm_driver.release hook now! > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Dave Airlie > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann > Cc:

Re: [PATCH 29/52] drm/bochs: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup

2020-02-24 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Instead rely on the automatic clean, for which we just need to check > that drm_mode_config_init succeeded. To avoid an inversion in the > cleanup we also have to move the dev_private allocation over to > drmm_kzalloc. > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio: decouple protected guest RAM form VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM

2020-02-24 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/2/24 下午9:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Subject: [PATCH] vhost: do not set VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when IOMMU is not used We enable device IOTLB unconditionally when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM is negotiated. This lead unnecessary IOTLB miss/update transactions when IOMMU is used. This

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/2/25 上午6:22, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 20:20, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Anton Ivanov wrote: On 24/02/2020 19:27, Willem de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM wrote: From:

Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:19:12AM +, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote: > From: Anton Ivanov > > Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which > arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no > fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter > than the MTU

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 9/9] ath5k: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

2020-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 19. 02. 20, 18:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > The ioreadX() helpers have inconsistent interface. On some architectures > > void *__iomem address argument is a pointer to const, on some not. > > > > Implementations of ioreadX()

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 9/9] ath5k: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

2020-02-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Krzysztof, On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:47 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 19. 02. 20, 18:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > The ioreadX() helpers have inconsistent interface. On some architectures > > > void *__iomem address

Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 24/02/2020 12:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:19:12AM +, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote: From: Anton Ivanov Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no fragments (data_len = 0) and

[PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread anton . ivanov
From: Anton Ivanov Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter than the MTU (752 in my experiments). This is observed on raw sockets reading off vEth interfaces in all

Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on vhost/linux-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master ipvs/master v5.6-rc3 next-20200224] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest

Re: INFO: task hung in lock_sock_nested (2)

2020-02-24 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:50:25PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:58:12 -0800 > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > > > HEAD commit:2bb07f4e tc-testing: updated tdc tests for basic filter > > git tree: net-next > > console output:

[PATCH v2] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread anton . ivanov
From: Anton Ivanov Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter than the MTU (752 in my experiments). This is observed on raw sockets reading off vEth interfaces in all

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio: decouple protected guest RAM form VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM

2020-02-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:26:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/2/24 下午3:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:45:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2020/2/24 下午2:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:01:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio: decouple protected guest RAM form VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM

2020-02-24 Thread Halil Pasic
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:26:20 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > That's better. > > How about attached? > > Thanks Thanks Jason! It does avoid the translation overhead in vhost. Tested-by: Halil Pasic Regarding the code, you fence it in virtio-net.c, but AFAIU this feature has relevance for other

RE: [RESEND PATCH v2 9/9] ath5k: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

2020-02-24 Thread David Laight
From: Geert Uytterhoeven > Sent: 24 February 2020 12:54 > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski ... > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ahb.c > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ahb.c > > > > index 2c9cec8b53d9..8bd01df369fb 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ahb.c > > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 9/9] ath5k: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

2020-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:54:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:47 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > On 19. 02. 20, 18:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > The ioreadX() helpers

Re: INFO: task hung in lock_sock_nested (2)

2020-02-24 Thread Hillf Danton
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:08:53 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:50:25PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > > > Seems like vsock needs a word to track lock owner in an attempt to > > avoid trying to lock sock while the current is the lock owner. > > Thanks for this

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso

2020-02-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:25:50PM +, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote: > From: Anton Ivanov > > Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which > arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no > fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter > than the MTU

Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Fix mem leak with vring_new_virtqueue()

2020-02-24 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/2/25 上午5:26, Suman Anna wrote: The functions vring_new_virtqueue() and __vring_new_virtqueue() are used with split rings, and any allocations within these functions are managed outside of the .we_own_ring flag. The commit cbeedb72b97a ("virtio_ring: allocate desc state for split ring