Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 03:57:06PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Yes, powerpc could certainly get more performance out of the slow > paths, and then there are a few parameters to tune. Can you clarify? The slow path is already in use on ARM64 which is weak, so I doubt there's superfluous

Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y

2020-07-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:01:28PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > I'm trying to put together a Micro Conference for Linux Plumbers > conference focused on "make LLVM slightly less shitty." Do you all > plan on attending the conference? Would it be worthwhile to hold a > session focused on

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:33:45PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > From 5d7941a498935fb225b2c7a3108cbf590114c3db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Waiman Long > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 22:29:16 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH 2/9] locking/pvqspinlock: Introduce > CONFIG_PARAVIRT_QSPINLOCKS_LITE > > Add a new

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication

2020-07-08 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/7/7 下午10:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Jason, On 7/7/2020 3:17 PM, Jason Wang wrote: On 2020/7/6 下午5:32, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Jason, On 7/3/2020 12:46 PM, Jason Wang wrote: On 2020/7/2 下午9:35, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Jason, On 7/2/2020 3:40 PM, Jason

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 7/8/20 4:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 03:57:06PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Yes, powerpc could certainly get more performance out of the slow paths, and then there are a few parameters to tune. Can you clarify? The slow path is already in use on ARM64 which is

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 7/8/20 1:10 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Excerpts from Waiman Long's message of July 8, 2020 1:33 pm: On 7/7/20 1:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Yes, powerpc could certainly get more performance out of the slow paths, and then there are a few parameters to tune. We don't have a good alternate

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 7/8/20 4:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:33:45PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: From 5d7941a498935fb225b2c7a3108cbf590114c3db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Waiman Long Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 22:29:16 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/9] locking/pvqspinlock: Introduce

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks

2020-07-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 7/8/20 7:50 PM, Waiman Long wrote: On 7/8/20 1:10 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Excerpts from Waiman Long's message of July 8, 2020 1:33 pm: On 7/7/20 1:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Yes, powerpc could certainly get more performance out of the slow paths, and then there are a few parameters