On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> -# else
> - const unsigned char cpu_iret[1];
> -# endif
> };
>
> static const struct patch_xxl patch_data_xxl = {
> @@ -42,7 +38,6 @@ static const struct patch_xxl patch_data_xxl = {
> .irq_save_fl= {
On 07.08.20 11:39, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
-# else
- const unsigned char cpu_iret[1];
-# endif
};
static const struct patch_xxl patch_data_xxl = {
@@ -42,7 +38,6 @@ static const struct patch_xxl patch_data_xxl
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:18:51PM +0800, Xin He wrote:
> Before setting shmem->pages to NULL, kfree() should
> be called.
> sg_free_table(shmem->pages);
> + kfree(shmem->pages);
> shmem->pages = NULL;
Pushed to drm-misc-fixes.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:54:29PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> blank. Add a bool to
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:55:01PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> qemu 5.0 introduces a new qxl hardware revision 5. Unlike revision 4
> (and below) the device doesn't switch back into vga compatibility mode
> when someone touches the vga ports. So we don't have to reserve the
> vga ports any
On 2020-08-06 17:47, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:23:01 +0200
...
This does work, and I'm tempted to queue this patch, but I'm wondering
whether we need to give up on a cross-architecture solution already
(especially keeping in mind that ccw is the only transport that is
When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
blank. Add a bool to force an update to fix that.
Cc: 1882...@bugs.launchpad.net
Fixes:
qemu 5.0 introduces a new qxl hardware revision 5. Unlike revision 4
(and below) the device doesn't switch back into vga compatibility mode
when someone touches the vga ports. So we don't have to reserve the
vga ports any more to avoid that happening.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
The last 32-bit user of stuff under CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is gone.
Remove 32-bit specific parts.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 92 +++--
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
The long term plan has been to replace Xen PV guests by PVH. The first
victim of that plan are now 32-bit PV guests, as those are used only
rather seldom these days. Xen on x86 requires 64-bit support and with
Grub2 now supporting PVH officially since version 2.04 there is no
need to keep 32-bit
Some paravirt macros are no longer used, delete them.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index dedc89a07826..99da08852df0 100644
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:43:42AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Since gpu is a modern-only device,
> tag config space fields as having little endian-ness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck
Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:44:48AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Virtgpu is modern-only. Use LE accessors for config space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann
___
Virtualization mailing list
On 07.08.20 13:38, Marco Elver wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:35PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.08.20 11:50, Marco Elver wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:24AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.08.20 11:01, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 18:06, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 06:16:47PM +0800, Xin He wrote:
> From: Qi Liu
>
> We should put the reference count of the fence after calling
> virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(). So add the missing dma_fence_put().
> virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(vgdev, buf, exbuf->size,
>
On 07.08.20 11:01, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 18:06, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 15:17, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 01:32PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
Testing my hypothesis that
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:02:59PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 07.08.20 11:39, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >
> > > -# else
> > > - const unsigned char cpu_iret[1];
> > > -# endif
> > > };
> > > static const struct
On 07.08.20 11:50, Marco Elver wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:24AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.08.20 11:01, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 18:06, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 15:17, Marco Elver wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 01:32PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
