On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:56:49 +,
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, I just figured it was a little overkill given the structure
definition is three lines away. Here it is, though.
As you use it twice, I think it makes the code more readable.
Cheers,
Mark.
From: Mark
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:00:25 +0100,
Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:16:56 +,
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Replace s390_root_dev_register() with root_device_register() etc.
Nice, one more special case generalized :) I'll give it a run.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:35:46 +,
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] s390: remove s390_root_dev_*()
Replace s390_root_dev_register() with root_device_register() etc.
[Includes fix from Cornelia Huck]
Signed-off-by: Mark
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 09:35 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
From: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] s390: remove s390_root_dev_*()
Replace s390_root_dev_register() with root_device_register() etc.
[Includes fix from Cornelia Huck]
Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 09:35 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
From: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] s390: remove s390_root_dev_*()
Replace s390_root_dev_register() with root_device_register() etc.
[Includes
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:35:46AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:29 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:00:25 +0100,
Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:16:56 +,
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
