Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: Defer skb allocation in receive path Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:53:38 -0800

2010-02-02 Thread David Miller
From: Rusty Russell Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:50:04 +1030 > From: Shirley Ma > > virtio_net receives packets from its pre-allocated vring buffers, then it > delivers these packets to upper layer protocols as skb buffs. So it's not > necessary to pre-allocate skb for each mergable buffer, then

Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: Add ability to detach unused buffers from vrings

2010-02-02 Thread David Miller
From: Rusty Russell Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:49:05 +1030 > From: Shirley Ma > > There's currently no way for a virtio driver to ask for unused > buffers, so it has to keep a list itself to reclaim them at shutdown. > This is redundant, since virtio_ring stores that information. So > add a new

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio net improvements

2010-02-02 Thread David Miller
From: Rusty Russell Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:57:06 +1030 > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:43 pm Rusty Russell wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >>Nice driver optimization from Shirley, but requires a new virtio hook. >> Do you want to take both? I have nothing else overlapping it. > > Dave, any news on thi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio net improvements

2010-02-02 Thread Rusty Russell
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:43 pm Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi Dave, > >Nice driver optimization from Shirley, but requires a new virtio hook. > Do you want to take both? I have nothing else overlapping it. Dave, any news on this? Shirley, I note that your final commit message did not contain th