On 5/10/2010 at 1:21 PM, in message 20100510172125.ga1...@kroah.com,
Greg KH
g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:05:02PM +, Hank Janssen wrote:
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 7:27 AM - Hank Janssen
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:52:01PM +, Hank Janssen wrote:
I am
Just a couple of style nits.
return at the end of a void function() is unnecessary.
Thank you for pointing this out.
I'll update the patch soon.
- Haiyang
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
According to memory-barriers.txt, an smp memory barrier
should always be paired with another smp memory barrier,
and I quote a lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an
error.
In case of vhost, failure to flush out used index
update before looking at the interrupt disable flag
could
* Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com [2010-05-05 16:37]:
Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where
Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand
what's going on from the outside, this information must be exposed.
For example, host can
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:46:08PM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com [2010-05-05 16:37]:
Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where
Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand
what's going on from the
