On 11/28/2011 01:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thre
On 11/25/2011 12:09 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
of
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:11:22 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:06:44AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > It'll be *clearer* to have two completely separate paths than to fill
> > with if() statements.
>
> Well, look at my patches. See how each new feature basically ad
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:08:52 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 00:44 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Or would it be simpler to enhance sscanf() with some weird format option
> > for suffixing? I haven't looked for similar cases, but I'd suspect a
> > big win in general.
> >
> > T
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Krishna Kumar2
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
>
> > Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
> >>
> >> My description is not clear again :(
> >> I mean the same vhost thead:
> >>
> >> vhost thread #0 transmits pack
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:39:11AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
> >
> > My description is not clear again :(
> > I mean the same vhost thead:
> >
> > vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
> > ...
> > vhost thread #0 move to another
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 06:49:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:19:42AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Device lock should be held when releasing a device, and specifically
> > when calling vhost_dev_cleanup(). Otherwise, RCU complains about it:
> >
> > [ 2025.642835
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:45:03PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:19:42 +0200
>
> > Device lock should be held when releasing a device, and specifically
> > when calling vhost_dev_cleanup(). Otherwise, RCU complains about it:
> ...
> > Cc: "Michael S.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:19:42AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Device lock should be held when releasing a device, and specifically
> when calling vhost_dev_cleanup(). Otherwise, RCU complains about it:
>
> [ 2025.642835] ===
> [ 2025.643838] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usag
