On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:32:28PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Can't we add struct attribute * to netdevice, and pass that in when
creating the kobj?
I like that idea, I think that will work and
Rusty, a Happy New Year!
how about my answer? What am I missing?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:39:13 +0100
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Rusty Russell
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 11:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:32:28PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
[...]
The last issue is how the rx_queue_attribute 'show' function
implementation for mergeable_rx_buffer_size will access the appropriate
per-receive queue EWMA
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com
wrote:
I don't think RPS should own this structure. It's just that there are
currently no per-RX-queue attributes other than those defined by RPS.
Agreed, there is useful attribute-independent functionality already
built
Sorry I missed this important piece of information, it appears that
netdev_queue (the TX equivalent of netdev_rx_queue) already has
decoupled itself from CONFIG_XPS due to an attribute,
queue_trans_timeout, that does not depend on XPS functionality. So it
seems that something somewhat equivalent
