On 2016/1/21 13:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:11:35AM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
queue for a whi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:11:35AM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
> On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
> >>queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The
On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vr
Fix build after API changes.
Reported-by: Kamal Mostafa
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
tools/virtio/asm/barrier.h| 22 +-
tools/virtio/linux/compiler.h | 9 +
tools/virtio/linux/kernel.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create
-
---
CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies
June 15 18, 2016, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
Wow new API with no comments anywhere, and no
commit log to say what it's good for.
Want to know what it does and whether
it's correct? You have to read the next patch.
So what is the point of splitting it ou
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
> queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
> spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
