On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:02 PM Alan Stern wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:09:52AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:47 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:13:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Bear with me, and perhaps it's a lack of
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:09:52AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:47 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:13:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Bear with me, and perhaps it's a lack of imagination on my part, but I
> > > don't see how to get to a
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:47 AM Alan Stern wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:13:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Bear with me, and perhaps it's a lack of imagination on my part, but I
> > don't see how to get to a globally generic "authorized" sysfs ABI
> > given that USB and Thunderbolt
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:13:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Bear with me, and perhaps it's a lack of imagination on my part, but I
> don't see how to get to a globally generic "authorized" sysfs ABI
> given that USB and Thunderbolt want to do bus specific actions on
> authorization toggle
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:03 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
> > > wrote:
> > > >
>
Forget about trust for the moment. Let's say the goal is to prevent
the kernel from creating any bindings other that those in some small
"allowed" set. To fully specify one of the allowed bindings, you
would have to provide both a device ID and a driver name. But in
practice this isn't
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 08:29:36AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:15:16PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > On 9/30/2021 10:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:17:09AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > The legacy drivers could be fixed,
On 10/1/2021 12:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
On 9/30/21 6:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01 2021, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:31:04 +0200
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:28:23 +0200
>> > Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> >> > @@ -249,6
Am 30.09.21 um 03:20 schrieb Halil Pasic:
This patch fixes a regression introduced by commit 82e89ea077b9
("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space") and
enables similar checks in verify() on big endian platforms.
The problem with checking multi-byte config fields in the
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:31:04 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:28:23 +0200
> > Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >>
> >> > This patch fixes a regression introduced by commit
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:12:21 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:20:49AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > This patch fixes a regression introduced by commit 82e89ea077b9
> > ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space") and
> > enables similar checks in
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
>
> On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/30/21 6:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > > And in
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:15:16PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On 9/30/2021 10:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:17:09AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The legacy drivers could be fixed, but nobody really wants to touch them
> > > anymore and they're impossible to
14 matches
Mail list logo
