Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, enabled);
Minor nit: let's call this softlockup_enabled. Makes it easier for the
reader ;)
P.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
touch_nmi_watchdog is attempting to tickle _all_ CPUs softlockup watchdogs.
It is supposed to only touch the current CPU, just like it only touches
the NMI watchdog on the current CPU.
Andi,
(sorry for the cut-and-paste).
touch_nmi_watchdogs sets EACH CPUs alert_counter to 0.
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Prarit Bhargava wrote:
You don't have to do them all -- you could do one with (as in my
previous patch -- which I'm not married to BTW ;) )
touch_cpu_softlockup_watchdog()
and all with
touch_softlockup_watchdog()
Well, I think changing the meaning
On 11/02/2016 05:31 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Dunno, but kernel-parameters.txt was already quite long... for a file
>>> that is referenced quite often. Adding admin-guide/ into the path does
>>> not really help.
>>
>> The big string name starts with Documentation/ :) There are some
