On 21.08.20 22:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>> On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
maintained by me
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
> >> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
> >>
> >
On 21.08.20 10:46, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 08/21/20 at 10:31am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
>>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>>>
>>
>> @Andrew, can we give th
On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>>
>
> @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Than
On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>
@Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb