Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-09-08 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 22:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand  wrote:
> 
>> On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
 For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
 maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.

>>>
>>> @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!
>>
>> ... I just spotted the patches in -next, strange I didn't get an email
>> notification. Thanks :)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20200819025501.gjhzlolfc%25a...@linux-foundation.org/
> 
> akpm!=spam :)
> 

I would never even dare to think that ... now I have to teach my spam
filter some good manners ;)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand  wrote:

> On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
> >> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
> >>
> > 
> > @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!
> 
> ... I just spotted the patches in -next, strange I didn't get an email
> notification. Thanks :)

https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20200819025501.gjhzlolfc%25a...@linux-foundation.org/

akpm!=spam :)
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 10:46, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 08/21/20 at 10:31am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
>>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>>>
>>
>> @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!
> 
> Saw this series in next already.

Hehe, yeah I also just stumbled over them while rebasing :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>>
> 
> @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!

... I just spotted the patches in -next, strange I didn't get an email
notification. Thanks :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
> 

@Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization