* Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
> >
> > OK, I'll do. :)
> > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> > kprobes ported. In that case,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
>
> OK, I'll do. :)
> BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me
> to pos
(2013/11/11 20:16), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>> Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c
>> which is separated from the function definition and is hard
>> to catch up the kernel update.
>> To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new
>> NOKPROBE_S
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c
> which is separated from the function definition and is hard
> to catch up the kernel update.
> To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at
> bu
Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c
which is separated from the function definition and is hard
to catch up the kernel update.
To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at
build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() mac
