On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:23:31 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> > For the specific case of overriding PCIe No Snoop (which is more problematic
> > from an Arm SMMU PoV) when assigning to a VM, would that not be easier
> > solved by
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> My take is that the drivers using this API are doing it to make sure
>> their HW blocks are setup in a way that is consistent with the DMA API
>> they are also using, and run in constrained embedded-style
>> environments that know
On 2022-04-07 14:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 07:18:48AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:17 AM
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:10:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 01:06:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:17 AM
>
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:10:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 01:06:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:50:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 01:06:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:50:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 12:18:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > Oh, I didn't know about device_get_dma_attr()..
> >
> > Which is completely broken for
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 12:18:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Oh, I didn't know about device_get_dma_attr()..
Which is completely broken for any non-OF, non-ACPI plaform.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
On 2022-04-06 15:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:07:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Didn't see it
I'll move dev_is_dma_coherent to device.h along with
device_iommu_mapped() and others then
No. It it
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:14:46AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Really? It is the only condition that dma_info_to_prot() tests to
> decide of IOMMU_CACHE is used or not, so you are saying that there is
> a condition where a device can be attached to an iommu_domain and
> dev_is_dma_coherent()
On 2022-04-05 17:16, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
vdpa and usnic are trying to test if IOMMU_CACHE is supported. The correct
way to do this is via dev_is_dma_coherent()
Not necessarily...
Disregarding the complete disaster of PCIe No Snoop on Arm-Based
systems, there's the more interesting
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:07:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Didn't see it
>
> I'll move dev_is_dma_coherent to device.h along with
> device_iommu_mapped() and others then
No. It it is internal for a reason. It also doesn't actually work
outside of the dma core. E.g. for non-swiotlb ARM
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:16:00PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
> index 760b254ba42d6b..24d118198ac756 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
> +++
11 matches
Mail list logo
