Re: [PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

2021-09-13 Thread Jason Wang


在 2021/9/13 下午3:48, Stefano Garzarella 写道:

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:53:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.

Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index e574fbf5e6df..f130d12df4b9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
   struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
   &num_vqs);
-    if (err)
+    /* We need at least on virtqueue */


s/on/one/

The rest LGTM.

Stefano



Will fix in next version.

Thanks





+    if (err || !num_vqs)
    num_vqs = 1;

num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids, num_vqs);
--
2.25.1

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization





___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

2021-09-13 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:53:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
> num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
> buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
> against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.
> 
> Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

2021-09-13 Thread Stefano Garzarella

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:53:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.

Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index e574fbf5e6df..f130d12df4b9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
   struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
   &num_vqs);
-   if (err)
+   /* We need at least on virtqueue */


s/on/one/

The rest LGTM.

Stefano


+   if (err || !num_vqs)
num_vqs = 1;

num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids, num_vqs);
--
2.25.1

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

2021-09-12 Thread Jason Wang
If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.

Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi 
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index e574fbf5e6df..f130d12df4b9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
   struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
   &num_vqs);
-   if (err)
+   /* We need at least on virtqueue */
+   if (err || !num_vqs)
num_vqs = 1;
 
num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids, num_vqs);
-- 
2.25.1

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization