smp_read_barrier_depends() doesn't exist any more, so reword the two
comments that mention it to refer to "dependency ordering" instead.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 2 +-
include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
index 22d9d183950d..87d8a38bdea1 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static inline bool __ref_is_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref,
* between contaminating the pointer value, meaning that
* READ_ONCE() is required when fetching it.
*
- * The smp_read_barrier_depends() implied by READ_ONCE() pairs
+ * The dependency ordering from the READ_ONCE() pairs
* with smp_store_release() in __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu().
*/
percpu_ptr = READ_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr);
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 417db0a79a62..808f9d3ee546 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r,
void *ptr)
return -ENOSPC;
/* Make sure the pointer we are storing points to a valid data. */
- /* Pairs with smp_read_barrier_depends in __ptr_ring_consume. */
+ /* Pairs with the dependency ordering in __ptr_ring_consume. */
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(r->queue[r->producer++], ptr);
--
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
