On 2017-11-16 05:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote:
From: Yang Zhang
Some latency-intensive workload have seen obviously performance
drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
is amplified
2017-11-15 20:13 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra :
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:01:40PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote:
> > Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt | 35
> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h |5 ++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |6
From: Quan Xu
Some latency-intensive workload have seen obviously performance
drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost I have seen is
inside idle path.
This patch introduces a new mechanism to poll
From: Yang Zhang
Some latency-intensive workload have seen obviously performance
drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost I have seen is
inside idle path.
This patch introduces a new mechanism
From: Yang Zhang
Some latency-intensive workload have seen obviously performance
drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost I have seen is
inside idle path.
This patch introduces a new mechanism
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote:
> From: Yang Zhang
>
> Some latency-intensive workload have seen obviously performance
> drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
> is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost I have
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:01:40PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote:
> Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt | 35
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h |5 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |6 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 73
>