在 2020/6/5 下午8:18, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 05.06.20 12:46, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/6/5 下午6:05, David Hildenbrand 写道:
I guess I know what's happening here. In case we only have DMA memory
when booting, we don't reserve swiotlb buffers. Once we hotplug memory
and online
On 05.06.20 12:46, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/6/5 下午6:05, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> I guess I know what's happening here. In case we only have DMA memory
>>> when booting, we don't reserve swiotlb buffers. Once we hotplug memory
>>> and online ZONE_NORMAL, we don't have any swiotlb DMA bounce
在 2020/6/5 下午6:05, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> I guess I know what's happening here. In case we only have DMA memory
>> when booting, we don't reserve swiotlb buffers. Once we hotplug memory
>> and online ZONE_NORMAL, we don't have any swiotlb DMA bounce buffers to
>> map such PFNs (total 0
在 2020/6/5 下午5:08, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> Please use the virtio-mem-v4 branch for now, v5 is still under
> construction (and might be scrapped completely if v4 goes upstream as is).
>
> Looks like a DMA issue. Your're hotplugging 1GB, which should not really
> eat too much memory. There was a
在 2020/6/5 下午5:36, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> I guess I know what's happening here. In case we only have DMA memory
> when booting, we don't reserve swiotlb buffers. Once we hotplug memory
> and online ZONE_NORMAL, we don't have any swiotlb DMA bounce buffers to
> map such PFNs (total 0 (slots),
On 05.06.20 11:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.06.20 11:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.06.20 10:55, Alex Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2020/1/9 下午9:48, David Hildenbrand 写道:
Ping,
I'd love to get some feedback on
a) The remaining MM bits from MM folks (especially,
On 05.06.20 11:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.06.20 10:55, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/1/9 下午9:48, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> Ping,
>>>
>>> I'd love to get some feedback on
>>>
>>> a) The remaining MM bits from MM folks (especially, patch #6 and #8).
>>> b) The general virtio
On 05.06.20 10:55, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/1/9 下午9:48, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> Ping,
>>
>> I'd love to get some feedback on
>>
>> a) The remaining MM bits from MM folks (especially, patch #6 and #8).
>> b) The general virtio infrastructure (esp. uapi in patch #2) from virtio
>> folks.
>>
在 2020/1/9 下午9:48, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> Ping,
>
> I'd love to get some feedback on
>
> a) The remaining MM bits from MM folks (especially, patch #6 and #8).
> b) The general virtio infrastructure (esp. uapi in patch #2) from virtio
> folks.
>
> I'm planning to send a proper v1 (!RFC) once
On 29.01.20 10:41, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.01.20 14:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 12.12.19 18:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
>>> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
>>>
>>> The
On 09.01.20 14:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.12.19 18:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
>> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
>>
>> The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible,
>>
On 12.12.19 18:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
>
> The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible,
> cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution
> Am 24.12.2019 um 08:04 schrieb teawater :
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your work.
>
> I Got following build fail if X86_64_ACPI_NUMA is n with rfc3 and rfc4:
> make -j8 bzImage
> GEN Makefile
> DESCEND objtool
> CALL
On 13.12.19 21:15, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 06:11:24PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
>> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
> Heya!
Hi Konrad!
>
> Would
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 06:11:24PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
> https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
Heya!
Would there be by any chance a virtio-spec git tree somewhere?
..snip..
>
This series is based on latest linux-next. The patches are located at:
https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux.git virtio-mem-rfc-v4
The basic idea of virtio-mem is to provide a flexible,
cross-architecture memory hot(un)plug solution that avoids many limitations
imposed by existing
16 matches
Mail list logo
