On 27/02/14 15:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 16:22, Raghavendra K T ha scritto:
On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either
running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor).
/me actually looks at
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:14:27AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
^^ - ?
also enables the
On 26/02/14 15:14, Waiman Long wrote:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
also enables the mutual monitoring of the queue head
Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
also enables the mutual monitoring of the
On 27/02/14 13:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
Il 27/02/2014 15:18, David Vrabel ha scritto:
On 27/02/14 13:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't
On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either
running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor).
/me actually looks at Waiman's code...
Right, this is really different from pvticketlocks, where the *unlock*
Il 27/02/2014 16:22, Raghavendra K T ha scritto:
On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either
running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor).
/me actually looks at Waiman's code...
Right, this is really
On 02/27/2014 09:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 15:18, David Vrabel ha scritto:
On 27/02/14 13:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto:
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock
code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock
On 02/27/2014 10:22 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either
running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor).
/me actually looks at Waiman's code...
Right, this is really
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
also enables the mutual monitoring of the queue head CPU and the
following node CPU in the queue
This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code
by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known,
in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It
also enables the mutual monitoring of the queue head CPU and the
following node CPU in the queue
12 matches
Mail list logo
