Sorry I mistakenly focused on NET case, please pass it over. I will do any
relevant suggestion in patch-based way. Thanks.
On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 23:11 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, Michael and Jason. And I'm sorry about late
> response.
> To be honest, I am on a summer
Thanks for your comments, Michael and Jason. And I'm sorry about late response.
To be honest, I am on a summer vacation until next Tuesday.
I noticed that what I wrote was not sufficient. Regardless of caching mechanism
existence, the "event" could legitimately be at any point out of the latest
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:38:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> I think don't think current code can work well if vq.num is grater than
> 2^15. Since all cached idx is u16. This looks like a bug which needs to be
> fixed.
That's a limitation of virtio 1.0.
> > * else if the interval of vq.num is
On 2017年07月30日 14:26, K. Den wrote:
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 19:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:37:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年07月26日 21:18, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年07月26日 20:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800,
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 19:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:37:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2017年07月26日 21:18, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2017年07月26日 20:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800,
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:37:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年07月26日 21:18, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2017年07月26日 20:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit
On 2017年07月26日 21:18, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年07月26日 20:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
it
On 2017年07月26日 20:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
it to check for notification. We try to valid
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
> was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
> it to check for notification. We try to valid cached used event by
> checking whether or not
On 2017年07月26日 18:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 07/26/2017 10:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
it to check for notification. We try to valid cached used
On 07/26/2017 10:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
> was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
> it to check for notification. We try to valid cached used event by
> checking whether or not it was ahead of
This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92. Since it
was reported to break vhost_net. We want to cache used event and use
it to check for notification. We try to valid cached used event by
checking whether or not it was ahead of new, but this is not correct
all the time, it could
12 matches
Mail list logo
