On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:56:56AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:00:05PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Interpret (otherwise-invalid) NULL apertures argument to mean all-memory
> > range. This will allow to remove several duplicates of this code from
> > drivers in following patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław
> > [for v1]
> > Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> >
> > ---
> > v2: added kerneldoc to corresponding DRM helper
> > ---
> > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 14 ++
> > include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h | 10 ++
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > index 30a18d4c9de4..0df148eb4699 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > @@ -1779,11 +1779,25 @@ int remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct
> > apertures_struct *a,
> > const char *name, bool primary)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + bool do_free = false;
> > +
> > + if (!a) {
> > + a = alloc_apertures(1);
> > + if (!a)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + a->ranges[0].base = 0;
> > + a->ranges[0].size = ~0;
> > + do_free = true;
> > + }
> >
> > mutex_lock(_lock);
> > ret = do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(a, name, primary);
> > mutex_unlock(_lock);
> >
> > + if (do_free)
> > + kfree(a);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_conflicting_framebuffers);
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h
> > index b069433e7fc1..1c1e53abb25d 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h
> > @@ -566,6 +566,16 @@ static inline void
> > drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_framebuffers - remove firmware
> > framebuffers
> > + * @a: memory range, users of which are to be removed
> > + * @name: requesting driver name
> > + * @primary: also kick vga16fb if present
> > + *
> > + * This function removes framebuffer devices (eg. initialized by firmware)
> > + * which use memory range described by @a. If @a is NULL all such devices
> > are
> > + * removed.
> > + */
>
> This looks like misplaced copypasta. You only need this once I think.
Ah no, just a fixup for the lack of kerneldoc we have. Can you pls split
this out into a separate patch?
Thanks, Daniel
> -Daniel
>
> > static inline int
> > drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
> > const char *name, bool primary)
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
> > ___
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
