Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling

Hi Vishnu, On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 05:35:22AM +, Vishnu Dasa wrote: On Jul 27, 2022, at 5:37 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote: Hi Arseniy, On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:54:05AM +, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: [...] 3) vmci/vsock: Same as 2), but i'm not sure about this changes. Will be very

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling

> On Jul 27, 2022, at 5:37 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Arseniy, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:54:05AM +, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This patchset includes some updates for SO_RCVLOWAT: >> >> 1) af_vsock: >> During my experiments with zerocopy receive, i found,

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling

> On Jul 27, 2022, at 11:08 PM, Arseniy Krasnov > wrote: > > On 27.07.2022 15:37, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> Hi Arseniy, >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:54:05AM +, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This patchset includes some updates for SO_RCVLOWAT: >>> >>> 1) af_vsock:

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling

Hi Arseniy, On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:54:05AM +, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: Hello, This patchset includes some updates for SO_RCVLOWAT: 1) af_vsock: During my experiments with zerocopy receive, i found, that in some cases, poll() implementation violates POSIX: when socket has non-