On 06/05/2012 11:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Ok.. So, I would love to hear a confirmation about whether this patch (which
>> removes cpu_bringup() in xen_play_dead()) will break things or it is good as
>> is.
>>
>> If its not correct, then we can
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Ok.. So, I would love to hear a confirmation about whether this patch (which
> removes cpu_bringup() in xen_play_dead()) will break things or it is good as
> is.
>
> If its not correct, then we can probably make __cpu_post_online() return an
> int,
>
On 06/05/2012 10:19 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:36:00PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 06/01/2012 09:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 01.06.12 at 17:13, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
>>
>>> wrote:
On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:36:00PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 09:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.06.12 at 17:13, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
>
> > wrote:
> >> On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
> >>
> >
On 06/01/2012 09:06 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.06.12 at 17:13, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
> wrote:
>> On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
>>
>>> wrote:
xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because
xen_play_d
>>> On 01.06.12 at 17:13, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
>
>> wrote:
>>> xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead()
>>> is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bri
On 06/01/2012 06:29 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
> wrote:
>> xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead()
>> is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name
>> suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path.
>>> On 01.06.12 at 11:11, "Srivatsa S. Bhat"
wrote:
> xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead()
> is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name
> suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path.
This might not be correct - the code as it is wi