On 08/02/2013 20:34, Tim Gardner wrote:
> This buffer overflow was introduced with
> 91e0c5f3dad47838cb2ecc1865ce789a0b7182b1
> (2.6.24).
There's no buffer overflow here. xen_mc_flush() resets b->cbidx.
David
> arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
> index 0d82003..5270407 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
> @@ -195,9 +195,10 @@ void xen_mc_callback(void (*fn)(void *), void *data)
> struct mc_buffer *b = &__get_cpu_var(mc_buffer);
> struct callback *cb;
>
> - if (b->cbidx == MC_BATCH) {
> + if (b->cbidx >= MC_BATCH) {
> trace_xen_mc_flush_reason(XEN_MC_FL_CALLBACK);
> xen_mc_flush();
> + return;
> }
>
> trace_xen_mc_callback(fn, data);
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
