On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:52:46PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
If I understand you correctly, you would be prefer to have unbounded waiting
with comments
justifying why we cannot have timeouts. I will roll out a patch once the tree
stabilizes.
Just make sure to add a comment explaining
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jirisl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:21 AM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: Staging: hv: Use
; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: Staging: hv: Use native wait primitives
On 02/11/2011 06:59 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
In preperation for getting rid of the osd layer; change
the code to use native wait interfaces. As part of this,
fixed the buggy implementation
...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: Staging: hv: Use native wait primitives
On 02/11/2011 06:59 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
In preperation for getting rid of the osd layer; change
the code to use native wait interfaces. As part of this,
fixed the buggy
...@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: Staging: hv: Use native wait primitives
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:35:56PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jirisl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:21 AM
To: KY Srinivasan
;
virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: Staging: hv: Use native wait primitives
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:35:56PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jirisl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4
On 02/11/2011 06:59 PM, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
In preperation for getting rid of the osd layer; change
the code to use native wait interfaces. As part of this,
fixed the buggy implementation in the osd_wait_primitive
where the condition was cleared potentially after the
condition was
