Re: fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling

2022-05-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:53:03 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > the somewhat confusing name of the discard_alignment queue limit, that > really is an offset for the discard granularity mislead a lot of driver > authors to set it to an incorrect value. This series tries to fix up > all these cases.

Re: fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling

2022-05-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
ping? ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling

2022-04-25 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Christoph, > the somewhat confusing name of the discard_alignment queue limit, that > really is an offset for the discard granularity mislead a lot of > driver authors to set it to an incorrect value. This series tries to > fix up all these cases. Not sure how I ended up with

fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling

2022-04-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi all, the somewhat confusing name of the discard_alignment queue limit, that really is an offset for the discard granularity mislead a lot of driver authors to set it to an incorrect value. This series tries to fix up all these cases. Diffstat: arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c |1 -