Le 01/03/2011 08:03, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:34:16PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
Hi,
here is another trace with kvm.ko compiled with debug flags.
the bug:
[12099.503414] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0b6635e9
[12099.503462] IP:
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:35 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
Hank
Janssen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6]
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:33 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
Hank
Janssen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6]
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:44 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
Hank
Janssen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6]
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:53 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
Hank
Janssen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6]
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:59 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
Hank
Janssen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6]
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:42:37AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:44 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org;
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:43:13AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:53 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org;
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:44:11AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:g...@kroah.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:59 PM
To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org;
The problem is that everyone reading [patch 1/6] thinks you're renaming
hv_device to vm_device or introducing a new struct vm_device. That
makes people annoyed. If you had written the patch description like this:
In the original code, the structs vm_device included a struct
hv_device.
10 matches
Mail list logo