Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:29AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer for a while at the > end of tx processing. The maximum time spent on polling were limited > through a module parameter. To avoid block rx, the loop will end it > there's new other works

Re: [PATCH] VSOCK: sock_put wasn't safe to call in interrupt context

From: Jorgen Hansen Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:53:56 -0700 > In the vsock vmci_transport driver, sock_put wasn't safe to call > in interrupt context, since that may call the vsock destructor > which in turn calls several functions that should only be called > from process

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/2] vhost: introduce vhost_has_work()

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:28AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > This path introduces a helper which can give a hint for whether or not > there's a work queued in the work list. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 6 ++ > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:46:33AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > On 10/22/2015 02:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:29AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > >>This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer for a while at the > >>end of tx processing. The maximum time spent on