Re: BUG: 'list_empty(>free_vbufs)' is true!

On Di, 2016-11-15 at 09:55 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/15/2016, 09:46 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Fr, 2016-11-11 at 17:28 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> On 11/09/2016, 09:01 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >>> On Di, 2016-11-08 at 22:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07,

Re: [GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield

On 10/25/2016 11:03 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Peter, > > here is v2 with some improved patch descriptions and some fixes. The > previous version has survived one day of linux-next and I only changed > small parts. > So unless there is some other issue, feel free to pull (or to apply >

[PATCH for-4.9] drm/virtio: allocate some extra bufs

virtio-gpu guest driver appearently can run out of buffers. allocate some extra buffers, as quick stopgap for 4.9. analyzing root cause and fixing it properly is TBD. Reported-by: Jiri Slaby Tested-by: Jiri Slaby Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann

Re: BUG: 'list_empty(>free_vbufs)' is true!

On Fr, 2016-11-11 at 17:28 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/09/2016, 09:01 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Di, 2016-11-08 at 22:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:43:24AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I can relatively easily reproduce this bug: > >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

On 15/11/2016 06:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:50:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:39:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 05:07:42PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: The virtio pstore driver

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

Hi, On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 15/11/2016 06:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:50:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:39:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Sat,

Re: [PATCH 2/3] qemu: Implement virtio-pstore device

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:23:36PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:50:03AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:05:47PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:57:10PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 20,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:50:11PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:06:28AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:50:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:39:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > [SNIP] > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:08:33AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h > b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h > index 0f400c0..38c3bb7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h > @@ -310,6 +310,8

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

On 15/11/2016 15:36, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 15/11/2016 06:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:50:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: Hi Michael, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at

Re: [PATCH] vhost/scsi: Remove unused but set variable

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:27:10PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: > Remove the unused but set variable se_tpg in vhost_scsi_nexus_cb() to > fix the following GCC warning when building with 'W=1': > > drivers/vhost/scsi.c:1752:26: warning: variable ‘se_tpg’ set but not used > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

Hi, On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 15/11/2016 15:36, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 15/11/2016 06:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at

Re: virtio_pci irq handling cleanups

FYI, I've got an updated version of this series that I will send out together with the affinity patches once a prep patch makes it to the tip tree. Feel free to ignore this version for now. ___ Virtualization mailing list

Re: BUG: 'list_empty(>free_vbufs)' is true!

On 11/15/2016, 09:46 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Fr, 2016-11-11 at 17:28 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 11/09/2016, 09:01 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> On Di, 2016-11-08 at 22:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:43:24AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: Remove unused but set variable

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: > Remove the unused but set variable vq in vhost_transport_send_pkt() to > fix the following GCC warning when building with 'W=1': > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c:198:26: warning: variable ‘vq’ set but not used > > Signed-off-by: Tobias

Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield

On 11/15/2016 01:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> For spinning loops people do often use barrier() or cpu_relax(). >> For most architectures cpu_relax and barrier are the same, but on >> some architectures cpu_relax

Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check

在 2016/11/15 23:47, Peter Zijlstra 写道: On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:08:33AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h index 0f400c0..38c3bb7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h +++

Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield

On 11/15/2016 02:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:19:53PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 11/15/2016 01:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: For spinning loops people do