Re: [PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support

On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 11/27] x86/power/64: Adapt assembly for PIE support

On Thu 2018-05-24 09:37:20, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:04 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:05, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 09/27] x86/acpi: Adapt assembly for PIE support

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:14 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > > Change the assembly code to use only

Re: [RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:27:04AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 21:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I re-read that discussion and I'm still unclear on the > > original question, since I got several apparently > > conflicting answers. > > > > I asked: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 00/12] XDP batching for TUN/vhost_net

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 05:04:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > We do not support XDP batching for TUN since it can only receive one > packet a time from vhost_net. This series tries to remove this > limitation by: > > - introduce a TUN specific msg_control that can hold a pointer to

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 0/5] Enable virtio_net to act as a standby for a passthru device

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:55:12AM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > The main motivation for this patch is to enable cloud service providers > to provide an accelerated datapath to virtio-net enabled VMs in a > transparent manner with no/minimal guest userspace changes. This also > enables

[PATCH v2 00/13] drm: Eliminate plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers

From: Ville Syrjälä Here are again the last (?) bits of eliminating the plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers. I've pushed everything else (thanks to everyone who reviewed them). Deepak said he'd tested the vmwgfx stuff, so I think it should be safe to land.

[PATCH v2 11/13] drm/virtio: Stop updating plane->crtc

From: Ville Syrjälä We want to get rid of plane->crtc on atomic drivers. Stop setting it. v2: s/fb/crtc/ in the commit message (Gerd) Cc: David Airlie Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 2/5] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:14 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/Kconfig > @@ -2,5 +2,6 @@ config HYPERV_NET > tristate "Microsoft Hyper-V virtual network driver" > depends on HYPERV > select

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/5] net: Introduce generic failover module

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h > index 03ed492c4e14..0f4ba52b641d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -1421,6 +1421,8 @@

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/5] net: Introduce generic failover module

On 5/25/2018 3:37 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: + spin_lock(_lock); Since register is not in fast path, this should be a mutex? This is Jiri's comment which made me to switch to spinlock from

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 2/5] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework

On 5/25/2018 3:34 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:14 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/Kconfig @@ -2,5 +2,6 @@ config HYPERV_NET tristate "Microsoft Hyper-V virtual network

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/5] net: Introduce generic failover module

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > + spin_lock(_lock); Since register is not in fast path, this should be a mutex? > +int failover_slave_unregister(struct net_device *slave_dev) > +{ > + struct net_device *failover_dev; > +

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/5] net: Introduce generic failover module

On 5/25/2018 3:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 03ed492c4e14..0f4ba52b641d 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 2/5] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework

On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:11:47 -0700 "Samudrala, Sridhar" wrote: > On 5/25/2018 3:34 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:14 -0700 > > Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > > > >> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/Kconfig > >> +++