On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when
> > rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may
> > exceed event offset
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:50:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/10/24 上午11:26, Liu, Yong wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasow...@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:06 PM
> > > To: Liu, Yong ; m...@redhat.com; Bie, Tiwei
> > >
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:32:49AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when
> > rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may
> > exceed event offset
From: Marvin Liu
When VIRTIO_F_RING_EVENT_IDX is negotiated, virtio devices can
use virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed to reduce the number of device
interrupts. At the moment, this is the case for virtio-net when the
napi_tx module parameter is set to false.
In this case, the virtio driver
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> All transports call __vsock_create() with the same parameters,
> most of them depending on the parent socket. In order to simplify
> the VSOCK core APIs exposed to the transports, this patch adds
> the vsock_create_connected()
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:55:47AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> virtio_transport and vmci_transport handle the buffer_size
> sockopts in a very similar way.
>
> In order to support multiple transports, this patch moves this
> handling in the core to allow the user to change the options
>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:57:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We want to copy from iov to buf, so the direction was wrong.
>
> Note: no real user for the helper, but it will be used by future
> features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
I'm still inclined to merge it now, incorrect code tends to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when
> rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may
> exceed event offset between status check and driver event update.
>
> However, it is possible
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:55:40AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following
> this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html
>
> With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs
> (using also
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:55:52AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> +static int __init vmci_transport_init(void)
> +{
> + int features = VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_DGRAM;
Where is this variable used?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:16:26AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:54:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2019/10/24 下午6:42, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > >
> > > > And we should try to avoid
> > > > putting ctrl vq and Rx/Tx vqs in the same DMA
On 2019/10/28 上午9:58, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:16:26AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:54:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/10/24 下午6:42, Jason Wang wrote:
Yes.
And we should try to avoid
putting ctrl vq and Rx/Tx vqs in the same DMA
On 2019/10/27 下午6:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:57:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We want to copy from iov to buf, so the direction was wrong.
Note: no real user for the helper, but it will be used by future
features.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
I'm still inclined
13 matches
Mail list logo
