Hi Gustavo
Am 03.03.20 um 19:20 schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>
>
> On 2/25/20 08:17, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
>>> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
>>> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to
On 2/25/20 08:17, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
>> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
>> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
>> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
Quoting Gustavo A. R. Silva (2020-02-25 14:03:47)
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
I remember
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct
