On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 5:15 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> The UABI was already defined for pointer to 64b value, and all the
> userspace users of this ioctl that I could find are already using a
> uint64_t (but zeroing it out to work around kernel only copying 32b).
> Unfortunately
From: Rob Clark
The UABI was already defined for pointer to 64b value, and all the
userspace users of this ioctl that I could find are already using a
uint64_t (but zeroing it out to work around kernel only copying 32b).
Unfortunately this ioctl doesn't have a length field, so out of paranoia
I
