Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/virtio: fix unblank

2020-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> blank.  Add a bool to force an update to fix that.
> 
> v2: use drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset() (Daniel).
> 
> Cc: 1882...@bugs.launchpad.net
> Fixes: 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't 
> change")
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c | 11 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c   |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> index 9ff9f4ac0522..4ab1b0ba2925 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct virtio_gpu_output {
>   int cur_x;
>   int cur_y;
>   bool enabled;
> + bool needs_modeset;

Maybe for a follow-up in -next: The clean atomic way of doing this is to
put this into a virtio_crtc_state, compute it in atomic_check, and then
fish it out (through old_state->state lookup, somewhat contrived I know)
in the commit side. Putting random atomic commit state tracking stuff into
non-state structures without appropriate amounts of locks is kinda iffy
and means more work for reviewers pondering whether it all works
correctly.

Cheers, Daniel


>  };
>  #define drm_crtc_to_virtio_gpu_output(x) \
>   container_of(x, struct virtio_gpu_output, crtc)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c
> index 2c2742b8d657..6c26b41f4e0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_display.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,17 @@ static int virtio_gpu_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc,
>  static void virtio_gpu_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>struct drm_crtc_state *old_state)
>  {
> + struct virtio_gpu_output *output = drm_crtc_to_virtio_gpu_output(crtc);
> +
> + /*
> +  * virtio-gpu can't do modeset and plane update operations
> +  * independant from each other.  So the actual modeset happens
> +  * in the plane update callback, and here we just check
> +  * whenever we must force the modeset.
> +  */
> + if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc->state)) {
> + output->needs_modeset = true;
> + }
>  }
>  
>  static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs virtio_gpu_crtc_helper_funcs = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
> index 52d24179bcec..65757409d9ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,9 @@ static void virtio_gpu_primary_plane_update(struct 
> drm_plane *plane,
>   plane->state->src_w != old_state->src_w ||
>   plane->state->src_h != old_state->src_h ||
>   plane->state->src_x != old_state->src_x ||
> - plane->state->src_y != old_state->src_y) {
> + plane->state->src_y != old_state->src_y ||
> + output->needs_modeset) {
> + output->needs_modeset = false;
>   DRM_DEBUG("handle 0x%x, crtc %dx%d+%d+%d, src %dx%d+%d+%d\n",
> bo->hw_res_handle,
> plane->state->crtc_w, plane->state->crtc_h,
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/virtio: fix unblank

2020-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:24:40AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 18. 08. 20, 9:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> > > framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> > > skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> > > blank.  Add a bool to force an update to fix that.
> > > 
> > > v2: use drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset() (Daniel).
> > > 
> > > Cc: 1882...@bugs.launchpad.net
> > > Fixes: 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't 
> > > change")
> > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann 
> > 
> > Tested-by: Jiri Slaby 
> 
> Ping.  Need an ack or an review to merge this.

In case you still need that, on both patches:

Acked-by: Daniel Vetter 
> 
> thanks,
>   Gerd
> 
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/virtio: fix unblank

2020-08-28 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:24:40AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 18. 08. 20, 9:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the
> > framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio:
> > skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay
> > blank.  Add a bool to force an update to fix that.
> > 
> > v2: use drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset() (Daniel).
> > 
> > Cc: 1882...@bugs.launchpad.net
> > Fixes: 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't 
> > change")
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann 
> 
> Tested-by: Jiri Slaby 

Ping.  Need an ack or an review to merge this.

thanks,
  Gerd

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization