Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-09-08 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 22:55, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff maintained by

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:33 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff > >> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree. > >> > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 10:46, Baoquan He wrote: > On 08/21/20 at 10:31am, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff >>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree. >>> >> >> @Andrew, can we give

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 21.08.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff >> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree. >> > > @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments?

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE

2020-08-21 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff > maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree. > @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb