Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-02-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 11:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I was hoping for an explicit ack from David Woodhouse, > but I guess the informal "let's not hold this up" > that was sent on v5 will do. Apologies; I was working under that assumption too. -- dwmw2 smime.p7s Description:

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-02-17 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:48:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > > module option. > > Michael, any update on this? > > --Andy I was hoping for an

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-02-16 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > module option. Michael, any update on this? --Andy ___ Virtualization mailing list

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-02-03 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > module option. > > This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's > off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. > > To the Xen people: is this okay? If