Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

Hi Am 14.03.20 um 11:59 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> I just received a resend email from 3 weeks ago :/ >> >> Do you want me to merge the mgag200 patch into drm-misc-next? > > Thanks but it depends on the

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > I just received a resend email from 3 weeks ago :/ > > Do you want me to merge the mgag200 patch into drm-misc-next? Thanks but it depends on the first patch in the series so either it could go with your ack

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] drm/mgag200: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)

Hi Krzysztof, I just received a resend email from 3 weeks ago :/ Do you want me to merge the mgag200 patch into drm-misc-next? Best regards Thomas Am 19.02.20 um 18:50 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > The ioreadX() helpers have inconsistent interface. On some architectures > void *__iomem