Hello,
from a Linux point of view, will a VM
5.2 give significant better dasd I/O performance
than a VM 4.4 system?
I tried to find some values in the z/VM
performance report, of course it is better but
its hard to find hout how much (10%,
20%, 50%, .. ? ?) because most comparison
is
We had a VM/ESA 2.4 system running as a guest under z/VM 5.1on a z800
z890. No problems.
Thanks,
Mark Vandale
MCS z/VM Team Lead
Office: (860) 823-2756
Cell:(860) 705-1657
CSC
On 3/15/06, Stefan Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I now read about the emulated FBA on SCSI that cones with vm 5.1 which gives
some
improvement in comparison with vm44, but there are no more i/o improvements
in the vm 5.1
performance report.
You don't want to do FBA emulation on SCSI if
Hello Les,
Thanks for the explanation. I see for ITO the possibilities are :
You can specify the following nnn values:
0
If specified, the link will be deactivated when there is no activity on
the link. RSCS will first send files that are queued for transmission,
or finish reception of the
Thanks for the input everyone!
We're looking at getting off our 9221 box running VM/ESA 2.4 and VSE/ESA
2.6.3. We have merely two VSE guest machines and just a handful of
programmers that use CMS for developemnt purposes. No Linux, no productio
n
VM guest machines other than the VSE guests.
Am interested in REXX calling Assembler.
Hi Dan: Although you will have a great boost in performance power be
careful about the performance expectations of your 3rd level VSE
guests. Each time the VSE guest is dispatched you will be running a
SIE under SIE (virtual machines are always dispatched in processing
mode known as emulation
Hi, Norman.
I can help you out with that..what exactly are you interested in doing?
DJ
Norman Graessle wrote:
Am interested in REXX calling Assembler.
