Re: VM/ESA 2.4 under z/VM 5.x

2006-03-15 Thread Mark D Vandale
We had a VM/ESA 2.4 system running as a guest under z/VM 5.1on a z800 
z890.  No problems.



Thanks,
Mark Vandale

MCS z/VM Team Lead
Office: (860) 823-2756
Cell:(860) 705-1657
CSC




This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.





   
 Alan Ackerman 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ANKOFAMERICA.COM  To 
 Sent by: VM/ESA   VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU   
 and z/VM   cc 
 Discussions   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject 
 .UARK.EDURe: VM/ESA 2.4 under z/VM 5.x   
   
   
 03/14/2006 11:51  
 PM
   
   
 Please respond to 
  VM/ESA and z/VM  
Discussions
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
.UARK.EDU 
   
   




I hope you can find someone who has tried it.

We haven't tried it. It certainly isn't supported. What hardware are you
planning to run on? VM
does not virtualize everything (in fact, cannot). z/VM 5.x is supported
only on zSeries and System
z9. VM/ESA 2.4.0 does not (officially) run on a z9.

It might work, especially if you aren't using anything that is hardware
dependent. (For example,
370 guests will NOT work.)

The last release of VM I can find that was listed (in the GI manual) as
supporting VM/ESA 2.4.0
guests is z/VM 4.3.0. The GI manual includes the caveat:

In general, an operating system, version, or release is supported as a
guest of
VM only on hardware (processors, DASD, and other devices) for which support
has been announced for that operating system, version, or release to run
native,
in an LPAR, or as a guest of VM.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:50:56 -0600, Dan Andrada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Hello Listers!

Just wanted to find out if anyone has been able to run VM/ESA 2.4 as a
guest under z/VM 5.x - any info would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
===
=


Re: VM/ESA 2.4 under z/VM 5.x

2006-03-15 Thread Dan Andrada
Thanks for the input everyone!

We're looking at getting off our 9221 box running VM/ESA 2.4 and VSE/ESA 

2.6.3. We have merely two VSE guest machines and just a handful of 
programmers that use CMS for developemnt purposes. No Linux, no productio
n 
VM guest machines other than the VSE guests. In our shop, VM is merely 

a hyper-visor for our VSE guests. However, our programming staff does 

not want to lose the various EXEC's they use in CMS and XEDIT.

We have a proposal to move to a z/890 processor to run z/VM and z/VSE to 

stay in support. To ease our migration, I would like to bring up VM/ESA 

2.4 as a second-level guest along with one or both of the VSE guests unde
r 
that, and progress from there. Even at the entry level configuration of a
 
z/890, its processing capacity is easily twice that of our current 9221 

utilization, so I don't think I need to be too concerned about processing
 
overhead.

I've asked IBM about this and I've not been given a definitive answer. Th
e 
latest FAQ that IBM has provided on their z/VM site states that z/VM will
 
run VSE/ESA and VM/ESA as guests. The Tell-All for me would be to find 

out if anyone has attempted or done this kind of migration.

So with that said, if anyone has any further information or experience in
 
doing a migration of this type, I would be very grateful for your input.

Thanks again!


Re: VM/ESA 2.4 under z/VM 5.x

2006-03-15 Thread David Kreuter
Hi Dan: Although you will have a great boost in performance power be 
careful about the performance expectations of your 3rd level VSE 
guests.  Each time the VSE guest is dispatched you will be running a 
SIE under SIE (virtual machines are always dispatched in processing 
mode known as emulation mode - the instruction that places a CPU in 
emulation mode is Start Interpretive Execution).  In long gone releases 
and hardware left by the curb this killed performance. Strides have been 
made in this area but a 3rd level production dispatch - better measure 
it carefully.


I have not done this on z boxes - so it may be tolerable. Best of luck 
and let us on the list know how it goes.

What type of CPU usage do you have today?
David Kreuter

Dan Andrada wrote:


Thanks for the input everyone!

We're looking at getting off our 9221 box running VM/ESA 2.4 and VSE/ESA 

2.6.3. We have merely two VSE guest machines and just a handful of 
programmers that use CMS for developemnt purposes. No Linux, no productio
n 
VM guest machines other than the VSE guests. In our shop, VM is merely 

a hyper-visor for our VSE guests. However, our programming staff does 


not want to lose the various EXEC's they use in CMS and XEDIT.

We have a proposal to move to a z/890 processor to run z/VM and z/VSE to 

stay in support. To ease our migration, I would like to bring up VM/ESA 


2.4 as a second-level guest along with one or both of the VSE guests unde
r 
that, and progress from there. Even at the entry level configuration of a


z/890, its processing capacity is easily twice that of our current 9221 


utilization, so I don't think I need to be too concerned about processing

overhead.

I've asked IBM about this and I've not been given a definitive answer. Th
e 
latest FAQ that IBM has provided on their z/VM site states that z/VM will


run VSE/ESA and VM/ESA as guests. The Tell-All for me would be to find 


out if anyone has attempted or done this kind of migration.

So with that said, if anyone has any further information or experience in

doing a migration of this type, I would be very grateful for your input.

Thanks again!



 



Re: VM/ESA 2.4 under z/VM 5.x

2006-03-14 Thread Adam Thornton

On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Alan Ackerman wrote:


I hope you can find someone who has tried it.

We haven't tried it. It certainly isn't supported. What hardware  
are you

planning to run on? VM
does not virtualize everything (in fact, cannot). z/VM 5.x is  
supported o

nly on zSeries and System
z9. VM/ESA 2.4.0 does not (officially) run on a z9.


You could certainly run it under Hercules under z/Linux, although  
there are probably licensing issues, since presumably VM/ESA 2.4 is  
not licensed to *that* processor.


Adam