On 9/20/2013 8:05 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, John E. Malmberg
malmb...@encompasserve.org wrote:
After all, if you are going to always use Perl to invoke it, why
add the hack to make it work as a command file?
Because you may not use Perl to invoke it. You
On Sep 21, 2013, at 11:02 AM, John E. Malmberg malmb...@encompasserve.org
wrote:
On 9/20/2013 8:05 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, John E. Malmberg
malmb...@encompasserve.org wrote:
After all, if you are going to always use Perl to invoke it, why
add the hack
On 9/21/2013 12:48 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On Sep 21, 2013, at 11:02 AM, John E. Malmberg malmb...@encompasserve.org
wrote:
On 9/20/2013 8:05 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, John E. Malmberg
malmb...@encompasserve.org wrote:
After all, if you are going to
On Sep 21, 2013, at 1:33 PM, John E. Malmberg malmb...@encompasserve.org
wrote:
The wrapper that simulates the shebang only runs it in a way that produces an
error message. I can not find any way to run it that takes advantage of the
wrapper and results in useful output.
All attempts
