John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
> So if you apply the patch, modify it to not change the last section, and
> the old dev/null hack will be compiled in.
As the patch was applied, I re-applied this :
Change 27554 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/03/20 13:03:07
Revert part of change 27546 related
John E. Malmberg wrote:
This patch fixes a few cases where it either it may be possible that a
buffer was overrun, or that a code change to dynamic allocation could
cause a sizeof() operator to be incorrect. In several places a buffer
was under allocated by 1 byte.
This also restores the def
This patch fixes a few cases where it either it may be possible that a
buffer was overrun, or that a code change to dynamic allocation could
cause a sizeof() operator to be incorrect. In several places a buffer
was under allocated by 1 byte.
This also restores the default behavior to be for s
