"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/20/2007 11:55:27 PM:
> I wish I had something easier or simpler to suggest. The current
> behavior is there by design and has been the way it is for a decade
> or more, so I wouldn't expect it to change.
An ACE along the ACLs for the relevant file
At 10:44 AM -0600 3/20/07, Mark Berryman wrote:
>Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>At 8:36 PM -0600 3/18/07, Mark Berryman wrote:
>>
>>>Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>>
A protected subsystem
identifier can trigger tainting more or less like running with -T on
the command line.
>>>That
Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 8:36 PM -0600 3/18/07, Mark Berryman wrote:
Craig A. Berry wrote:
A protected subsystem
identifier can trigger tainting more or less like running with -T on
the command line.
That was the ticket. The process on the malfunctioning system has a protected
At 8:36 PM -0600 3/18/07, Mark Berryman wrote:
>Craig A. Berry wrote:
>> A protected subsystem
>>identifier can trigger tainting more or less like running with -T on
>>the command line.
>>
>That was the ticket. The process on the malfunctioning system has a protected
>subsystem rights identifier
At 11:43 AM -0600 3/16/07, Mark Berryman wrote:
>Ok, this one has me stumped.
>
>I have two nearly identical systems (both are DS10s running VMS V8.3 but they
>don't have identical disk farms). Both are running the exact same copy of
>HP's Perl 5.8.6 distribution plus the patch they have release
