Re: Results so far of trying to get 04_cpanplus-Module.t to pass on VMS

2007-08-30 Thread John E. Malmberg
Craig A. Berry wrote: At 9:15 AM -0500 8/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote: I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS. Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons: rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'. This i

Re: Results so far of trying to get 04_cpanplus-Module.t to pass on VMS

2007-08-30 Thread David Landgren
John E. Malmberg wrote: [...] One issue is that the VMS specific File::Spec routines should never be calling vmsify() or unixify(). These routines are not reversible, even if they make some cases of parsing more convenient, there are a number of VMS path specifications that can not make the

Re: Results so far of trying to get 04_cpanplus-Module.t to pass on VMS

2007-08-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 9:15 AM -0500 8/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote: >I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS. > >Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons: > >rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'. This is >noticed because a

Re: Results so far of trying to get 04_cpanplus-Module.t to pass on VMS

2007-08-30 Thread John E. Malmberg
David Landgren wrote: John E. Malmberg wrote: [...] One issue is that the VMS specific File::Spec routines should never be calling vmsify() or unixify(). These routines are not reversible, even if they make some cases of parsing more convenient, there are a number of VMS path specifications

Results so far of trying to get 04_cpanplus-Module.t to pass on VMS

2007-08-29 Thread John E. Malmberg
I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS. Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons: rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'. This is noticed because a bug somewhere else in it is creating that file. I ha