Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 9:15 AM -0500 8/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS.
Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons:
rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'.
This i
John E. Malmberg wrote:
[...]
One issue is that the VMS specific File::Spec routines should never be
calling vmsify() or unixify(). These routines are not reversible, even
if they make some cases of parsing more convenient, there are a number
of VMS path specifications that can not make the
At 9:15 AM -0500 8/29/07, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS.
>
>Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons:
>
>rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'. This is
>noticed because a
David Landgren wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
[...]
One issue is that the VMS specific File::Spec routines should never be
calling vmsify() or unixify(). These routines are not reversible,
even if they make some cases of parsing more convenient, there are a
number of VMS path specifications
I have been working on trying to get the CPANPLUS tests to pass on VMS.
Right now 04_cpanplus-Module is failing for at least the following reasons:
rmtree() is broken on VMS as it can not handle a file named '.;'. This
is noticed because a bug somewhere else in it is creating that file.
I ha
